Bottom line, Adobe does not deserve your money for this application, which they clearly dislike within the company (when you make a bug report, it's interesting to note that it's called GoLive, not Adobe GoLive). GoLive CS2 crashes regularly for me several times a day, and has even managed to crash WHILE SAVING A VERY IMPORTANT FILE, which wiped out an entire day's work for me, causing me to redo it all. I want to warn you about GoLive - it is the most frustrating, least reliable, most crash-prone app I have used since switching to OS X. at the end of the day real web designers hand-code anyway!
i'm sure both do what they do equally as well and you should use whichever one you feel most comfortable with. Whatever the differences between the latest iterations of these two old war-horses, it hardly matters.
#ADOBE GOLIVE 6.0 DOWNLOAD CODE#
it just happens to be slightly less spaghetti-like than the code generated by golive! dreamweaver still generates horrible code spaghetti and takes about a hundred lines of said electronic pasta to do what you can hand-code in one.
Then when using CSS for layout became the 'next big thing' golive was left behind, as macromedia started really pushing the fact that dreamweaver wrote 'clean, standards compliant code' and thus dreamweaver gained the reputation as being the professional's choice. that was back when both apps created their layouts using clunky, hacky, nested tables, built with horrible code spaghetti - when no-one really cared about concepts like standards compliance, as long as it worked on exploder and netscrape. I used to use golive way back in the days when it was called 'golive cyberstudio' and it was streets ahead of the similarly youthful dreamweaver at the time - at least in terms of ease of use.
but it seems like adobe thinks there's life in the old dog yet. i'd thought golive was destined to be taken out the back and put out of its misery with adobe's gobbling up of macromedia.
0 kommentar(er)
